265590 Minnesota School Obesity Prevention Policies: Leader or Laggard?

Tuesday, October 30, 2012 : 8:52 AM - 9:08 AM

Sara Coulter, MPH, RD , Dept of Family Medicine & Community Health, Program in Health Disparities Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
Cynthia Davey, MS , Biostatistical Design and Analysis Center, Clinical Translational Science Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
Susan Lowry, BS , Biostatistical Design and Analysis Center, Clinical Translational Science Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
Martha Y. Kubik, PhD, RN , School of Nursing, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
Marilyn S. Nanney, PhD, MPH, RD , Dept of Family Medicine & Community Health, Program in Health Disparities Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
Introduction: States leading the nation in school obesity prevention policies may serve as models for other states. Methods: Using the 2008 School Health Profiles principal's data, three physical activity (PA) items and four food/nutrition and PA scales were compared between 300 Minnesota (MN) and 6,432 secondary schools in 27 other states. Scales included: 1) less healthy snack and beverage availability (α=0.75), 2) use of healthy eating strategies (α=0.65), 3) prohibited advertisement of less healthy foods (α=0.88) and 4) physical education (PE) teacher qualifications (α=0.75). Results: MN scored lower on less healthy snack and beverage availability (scale of 10, low score better; mean=5.1 vs. 4.4, p=0.0003) and PE teacher qualifications (scale of 6, high score better; mean=4.9 vs. 5.1, p=0.012). MN was less likely to require PE for students in any grade 6-12 (p=0.010), teach PE in grades 11 and 12 (p=<0.0001 for both), and offer intramural activities (p=0.021). Both MN and sampled schools scored similarly on prohibited advertisement. MN reported greater use of healthy eating strategies (scale of 5, high score better; mean=1.8 vs. 1.4, p=< 0.0001), was less likely to allow exemption from a required PE course (p=<0.0001 to 0.701), and was more likely to teach PE in grades 6 and 10 (p=0.030 and 0.003 respectively). Discussion: MN leads the way in using healthy eating strategies and disallowing exemptions from PE. However, other state leaders need to be identified in the areas of snack/beverage and intramural availability, PE teacher training and for requiring PE in secondary education.

Learning Areas:
Chronic disease management and prevention
Conduct evaluation related to programs, research, and other areas of practice
Public health or related organizational policy, standards, or other guidelines
Public health or related public policy
Public health or related research

Learning Objectives:
1. Compare the food/nutrition policies and practices in Minnesota secondary schools relative to a sample of US schools. 2. Compare the physical activity policies and practices in Minnesota secondary schools relative to a sample of US schools. 3. Identify Minnesota as a leader or laggard in school obesity prevention policies.

Keywords: Obesity, School Health

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I serve as Project Manager for several federally funded grants focused on schools and obesity prevention. I have worked in the field of school meal programs and school wellness policies for more than 2 years.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.