265772 A combined lifestyle and medication intervention to reduce CHD risk

Monday, October 29, 2012 : 2:50 PM - 3:10 PM

Thomas C. Keyserling, MD, MPH , Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
Stacey Sheridan, MD, MPH , School of Medicine, UNC-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
Lindy Draeger, MPH , Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, UNC-Chapel Hill, Chapel HIll, NC
Background: Coronary heart disease (CHD) is the leading cause of death in the United States. As about half of U.S. adults are seen by primary care clinicians annually, effective prevention interventions offered in this setting have great potential for public health impact.

Methods: We developed two versions (web-based and counselor-based) of a combined lifestyle and medication intervention to reduce CHD risk and compared their effects in a randomized trial conducted at five socioeconomically diverse clinics in a practice-based research network. Both interventions are tailored to participants' baseline risk factors and treatment preferences and include similar content: a web-based decision aid, 4 monthly contacts during an intensive intervention phase (4 months) and 3 brief contacts at 2 month intervals during a maintenance phase (8 months). Major study outcomes were measured at 4 and 12 month follow-up, with the primary outcome the change in 10 year Framingham risk score at 4 month follow-up. Secondary outcomes include change in dietary intake, physical activity, blood pressure, blood lipids, and medication use. Acceptability, ease of implementation, and cost-effectiveness will also be assessed.

Results: Of 489 participants randomized to date, 263 have returned for the 4 month follow-up visit (93% of those who have reached this follow-up time point in the study). At this session, 4 month follow-up results including the primary study outcome will be reported for our full sample.

Conclusions: Understanding differences in outcomes between the two formats of this intervention will help inform successful implementation of high quality CHD prevention programs.

Learning Areas:
Chronic disease management and prevention
Implementation of health education strategies, interventions and programs

Learning Objectives:
1) Differentiate the effect of a web-based vs. counselor-based behavioral intervention to reduce heart disease risk. 2) Discuss the acceptability and ease of implementation of two intervention formats.

Keywords: Food and Nutrition, Heart Disease

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I have been the principal or co-investigator on multiple federally funded grants of behavioral interventions to reduce chronic disease risk.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.