270110 Feasibility and acceptability of HIV screening in the dental care setting among national AIDS directors

Monday, October 29, 2012 : 3:05 PM - 3:17 PM

Madeleine Goldstein , Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
Rebecca Winitzer, MS, MSW , School of Social Service Administration, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
Margaret R. Pereyra, DrPH , Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
Stephen Abel, DDS, MSD , Department of Diagnostic Sciences, Nova Southeastern University College of Dental Medicine, Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Tamara Kuper , Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
Harold A. Pollack, PhD , School of Social Service Administration, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
Lisa Metsch, PhD , Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
BACKGROUND: One-fifth of approximately 1 million Americans living with HIV are undiagnosed and unaware of their infected status. In 2006, the CDC issued recommendations to incorporate routine HIV screening in all healthcare settings, including dental clinics. Increasing the number of individuals who know their serostatus could decrease HIV incidence and reduce morbidity and mortality. METHODS: During April 2010, the National Alliance of State and Territorial AIDS Directors (NASTAD), an organization composed of the highest ranking state HIV/AIDS officials, completed a quantitative survey regarding the feasibility and acceptability of incorporating HIV screening in dental settings (n=54). We used descriptive analyses to describe how state directors view the dental setting as a venue for HIV screening and key barriers towards implementation. RESULTS: While 19% of health departments (n=10) currently support HIV testing in dental settings, nearly one-half indicated no plans to support implementation and only 9% are currently discussing it. Lack of funding to support implementation was the most important barrier identified by NASTAD officials (60%), followed by insufficient data justifying HIV screening (38%) and dentists lack of interest in HIV testing (38%). CONCLUSIONS: HIV testing continues to be an important tool to facilitate earlier diagnosis and treatment; however, it is underutilized in dental settings. The current movement in the dental profession towards offering oral diagnostics provides a unique opportunity to expand screening efforts to include HIV testing. Future research is needed to identify methods to increase willingness to test or expand testing and decrease structural barriers identified by key stakeholders.

Learning Areas:
Clinical medicine applied in public health
Public health or related organizational policy, standards, or other guidelines
Public health or related public policy

Learning Objectives:
1. List key barriers to implementing HIV testing in the dental care setting. 2. Describe the current health care settings in which health departments have implemented HIV testing. 3. Examine plans for supporting implementation of HIV diagnostic screening in dental settings by CDC-funded health departments.

Keywords: Policy/Policy Development, Oral Health

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am a doctoral researcher on this project and a phd candidate in health care service research on many areas, including HIV prevention
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.