271054 Perceived Versus Actual Factors Associated with Adoption and Maintenance of Evidence-Based Physical Activity Programs

Tuesday, October 30, 2012

Cheryl Der Ananian, PhD , School of Nutrition and Health Promotion, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ
Pankaja Desai, PhD , Institute for Health Research and Policy, Center for Research on Health and Aging, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL
Renae Smith-Ray, PhD , Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL
Rachel Seymour, PhD , Institute for Health Research and Policy, Center for Research on Health and Aging, Chicago, IL
Susan Hughes, PhD , Center for Research on Health and Aging, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL
Despite the need to increase the availability of evidence-based (EB) physical activity (PA) programs for people with arthritis (Brady et al., 2009), little is known about effective ways of translating and diffusing these programs. This study used qualitative methods to examine factors related to the adoption and maintenance of EB PA programs in two states. Fit and Strong! is a PA/ health behavior change program for older adults with osteoarthritis. We conducted focus groups (n=6) with decision makers who were potential adopters of Fit and Strong! prior to their offering the program. We then conducted in-depth interviews (n=18) with key informants from organizations that adopted the program. Both sets of participants were asked to identify barriers and facilitators to the adoption and maintenance of PA programs in general and Fit and Strong!, specifically. Four perceived and five actual generic factors were identified. Both contemplators and adopters identified client interest/need as the primary factor. Cost was also reported but ranked higher for contemplators than program adopters. Participants identified four perceived vs. two actual factors as associated with program-specific adoption. Space was identified by both groups. Actual generic factors associated with adoption included client interest, safety and effectiveness, evidence, cost, and appeal to multiple user groups. Actual generic factors associated with maintenance included client interest, enrollment, instructor satisfaction, instructor retention and cost. Differences found between respondent groups indicate that EB programs should craft different marketing messages to address barriers and facilitators perceived and experienced by providers engaged in specific stages of translation.

Learning Areas:
Implementation of health education strategies, interventions and programs
Planning of health education strategies, interventions, and programs
Public health or related education
Public health or related research

Learning Objectives:
1. Demonstrate the application of the RE-AIM model through describing program-related and organizational factors that influence the adoption, implementation and maintenance of evidence-based programs. 2. Identify similarities and differences between factors associated with the adoption and maintenance of evidence-based programming. 3. Describe anticipated barriers and facilitators to adoption and maintenance of evidence-based physical activity programs and solutions that can improve the effectiveness and efficiency of dissemination.

Keywords: Aging, Exercise

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I have a PhD in Public Health and Aging and serve as Project Manager on the dissemination of Fit and Strong!.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.