142nd APHA Annual Meeting and Exposition

Annual Meeting Recordings are now available for purchase

296237
Outcome of a quality-controlled Mammography screening program---an experience of a population-based study in Taiwan

142nd APHA Annual Meeting and Exposition (November 15 - November 19, 2014): http://www.apha.org/events-and-meetings/annual
Tuesday, November 18, 2014

Huay-Ben Pan , Department of Radiology, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
Kam-Fai Wong, PHD , Institute of Statistics, National University of Kaohsiung, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, ROC, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
Tsung-Lung Yang , Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
Giu-Cheng Hsu, MD , Department of Radiology, Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC, Taipei, Taiwan
Chen-Pin Chou , Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
Jer-Shyung Huang , Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
San-Kang Lee , Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
Yi-Hong Chou , Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, National Yang Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
Chia-Ling Chiang , Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
Huei-Lung Liang , Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
Purpose

To report the clinical outcome of screening mammography in Taiwan.

Materials and Methods: A total of 2,473,608 consecutive screening mammographies were performed for women of ages 50-69 years (2004-2009) and 45-69 years thereafter with the screening coverage of 33.2% of the target population in the recent two years. The workload of every screening radiologist, the overall recall rate, PPV1, cancer detection rate, cancer incidence rate from the screening, one-year interval cancer, sensitivity and specificity of the screening mammography are calculated, which are also compared with the ACR recommendation level.

Results: The cancer detection rates and cancer incidence rates increase from 3.94-4.08 and 4.80-5.04 to 4.71-5.04 and 5.71 after 2009, implying high occurrence of the breast cancer in younger age group of 45-49 years. The recall rates (9.3-10.0%) in this review are within the ACR recommendation range (<10%) and the PPV1 has also reached the ACR recommended level (> 5%) in the recent two years. The sensitivity in our study is slightly lower than that of ACR recommended level (> 85%), which is still comparable to the result of Vermont area in USA. Although the workload (screenees/screeners) for every radiologist each year has increased from 150 in 2004 to 1360 in 2012, it seems not to worsen the outcome quality of this screening program.

Conclusion: From the outcome review of this mammography screening, we still have a room to ameliorate our performance through comprehensive and continue education to improve the competence of cancer detection and decrease false negative cases.

Learning Areas:

Chronic disease management and prevention
Other professions or practice related to public health

Learning Objectives:
Analyze the clinical outcome of a screening mammography Compare the screening indicators (recall rate, PPV1, cancer detection rate, one-year interval cancer, sensitivity and specificity) with the ACR recommendation level

Keyword(s): Women's Health, Cancer and Women’s Health

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I had been the principle of quality promotion program of mammography screening in Taiwan that funded grants focusing on the quality improvement of mammography screening, including education, training, auditing and feedback based on medical audit from government database
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.