142nd APHA Annual Meeting and Exposition

Annual Meeting Recordings are now available for purchase

297699
Engaging campus communities in sexual violence prevention: A randomized-control trial of a bystander intervention program

142nd APHA Annual Meeting and Exposition (November 15 - November 19, 2014): http://www.apha.org/events-and-meetings/annual
Monday, November 17, 2014 : 12:30 PM - 12:50 PM

Sarah McMahon, Ph.D. , School of Social Work, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ
Jane Palmer, Ph.D. , School of Social Work, Rutgers University, New Brunswick
Campus sexual assault is well documented as a major public health issue. Researchers estimate that 19- 25% of women and 6% of men report experiences of attempted or completed sexual assaults since entering college, with a multitude of  negative impacts on survivor’s health and well-being. One approach for sexual assault prevention is bystander intervention, which shifts the focus on victims and perpetrators to the role of community members, suggesting that these members can intervene when faced with situations involving sexual violence (before, during, or after the assault). 

A number of questions remain about the best ways to deliver bystander education and what dosage is sufficient to produce both attitudinal and behavioral change.  This paper uses a longitudinal, experimental design to compare exposure to one or three sessions of a peer education theater program, SCREAM Theater, and its impact on a range of bystander-related outcomes in situations involving sexual violence.

A survey was administered to assess a number of outcomes, including rape myth beliefs, bystander attitudes, bystander behaviors, perpetration and victimization.  A total of 663 participants completed surveys across three waves and are analyzed in this paper.

Results indicate after the first dose, male students’ bystander intentions and beliefs about friend norms increased while female students’ scores did not change.  After receiving the additional doses, the experimental three dose group had significantly greater bystander intentions relative to the one dose control group.  A number of implications for educators and researchers involved in delivering sexual violence prevention will be discussed.

Learning Areas:

Conduct evaluation related to programs, research, and other areas of practice

Learning Objectives:
Differentiate primary, secondary and tertiary forms of sexual violence prevention Explain the conceptual foundation for bystander intervention as a strategy for sexual violence prevention Discuss the impact of participation in a bystander intervention program on a number of key attitudinal and behavioral outcomes

Keyword(s): Sexual Assault, Prevention

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I have been the principal investigator on a federally funded grant focusing on sexual violence prevention programming for college students, and have served as the principal investigator of a number of state and locally funded projects on sexual violence prevention. I have published a number of articles on the subject in peer reviewed journals and presented nationally.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.