142nd APHA Annual Meeting and Exposition

Annual Meeting Recordings are now available for purchase

299012
Factors that facilitate and impede adoption and implementation of screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment in New York State school-based health centers

142nd APHA Annual Meeting and Exposition (November 15 - November 19, 2014): http://www.apha.org/events-and-meetings/annual
Tuesday, November 18, 2014 : 9:10 AM - 9:30 AM

Brett Harris, DrPH , Department of Health Policy, Management and Behavior, University at Albany, School of Public Health, Rensselaer, NY
Benjamin Shaw, PhD , Department of Health Policy, Management and Behavior, University at Albany, School of Public Health, Rensselaer, NY
Barry R. Sherman, PhD , Department of Health Policy, Management and Behavior, University at Albany, School of Public Health, Rensselaer, NY
Hal Lawson, PhD , University at Albany, School of Social Welfare, Albany, NY
Background:  Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) has been endorsed by the American Academy of Pediatrics as an evidence-based strategy to address risky substance use among adolescents in primary care settings.  However, less than half of pediatricians even screen adolescents for substance use.

Methods:  Between May and June of 2013, an electronic survey was distributed to the total population of 162 New York State school-based health center (SBHC) program directors and clinicians who serve students of middle and/or high school age to identify factors which facilitate or impede adoption and implementation of SBIRT in this unique practice setting (40% response rate).

Results:  Less than 30% of survey participants felt they could be effective at helping students reduce their substance use, 63% did not believe it was their role to use a standardized screening tool, 20-30% did not feel confident in their ability to perform specific aspects of intervention and management, and 58% were unaware of SBIRT.  These factors were found to be associated with frequency of substance use screening and intervention practice (p<.05).  The greatest barriers to delivering SBIRT were time constraints, believing that students will be dishonest about their use, lack of training, not knowing where to refer students for treatment, and uncertainty regarding the effectiveness of available treatments. 

Conclusion:  Findings from this study suggest raising awareness of SBIRT and providing education and training which target role responsibility; self-efficacy; reducing barriers; and how, by delivering SBIRT, clinicians can effectively help students reduce their substance use.

Learning Areas:

Administer health education strategies, interventions and programs
Assessment of individual and community needs for health education
Public health or related organizational policy, standards, or other guidelines

Learning Objectives:
Explain the rationale for the delivery of substance use screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) in school-based health centers. Identify key attitudes, beliefs, and perceptions associated with increased delivery of substance use screening and intervention. Describe facilitators and barriers to the adoption and implementation of SBIRT in school-based health centers.

Keyword(s): School-Based Health

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I have evaluated three federally funded SBIRT grants and have led a team on pilot and demonstration projects of SBIRT in school-based health centers. Among my scientific and practical interests has been the development of strategies to increase the adoption and implementation of SBIRT in pediatric settings, particularly school-based health centers.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.