142nd APHA Annual Meeting and Exposition

Annual Meeting Recordings are now available for purchase

299271
Consent challenges for minors participation in HIV and related risk research in Thailand

142nd APHA Annual Meeting and Exposition (November 15 - November 19, 2014): http://www.apha.org/events-and-meetings/annual
Monday, November 17, 2014 : 10:30 AM - 10:42 AM

Thomas E. Guadamuz, PhD, MHS , Department of Society and Health, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Mahidol University, Salaya, Nakorn Pathom, Thailand
Lloyd Goldsamt, PhD , NDRI, NY
Pimpawun Boonmongkon, PhD , Center for Health Policy Studies and Department of Society and Health, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Mahidol University, Salaya, Thailand
Gay and bisexual youth (GBY) under 18 years are often excluded from HIV and related risk research in the Global South. Reasons for this are many, but the most common is GBY’s reluctance to participate in studies that require guardian permission and IRB and local community standards that oppose waiving the guardian permission requirement.  This study drew on a rights-based, community engaged approach in Bangkok, Thailand to illuminate barriers and potential solutions to this problem through focus groups discussions and individual interviews with 12th grade GBY and with mothers and fathers of high school students who were and were not aware of their son’s sexual orientation.  Participants were asked to respond to mock informed consent forms for research on a broad range of youth risk behaviors. Youth expressed positive aspects of involving parents in decisions tempered by concerns about harms posed by disclosing same-sex attraction through permission forms and their general disposition for signing their parents’ signatures.  Generally, parents were receptive to granting permission for their children to participate in studies directed at reducing HIV risk and socially sensitive studies including substance use, violence, unwanted teenage pregnancy and gay-oriented studies. However, professional parents were more cautious and not as trusting of academic institutions or researchers than non-professional parents. Fathers, more than mothers, seemed hesitant in granting permission for their sons’ participation in gay-oriented studies. While most parents did not favor the waiver of guardian permission, they responded positively to waivers when cast as a means of ensuring that their children had fair access to research that could improve their health—as long as some adult proxy mechanism was put in place to protect youths’ rights. The study’s findings have potential to influence current IRB practices in Thailand. Parents expressed faith in schools as proxy protectors of their sons suggest that collaborating with schools in Thailand may be an ethical approach to waiver of guardian permission and a means of involving GBY in critical HIV-related prevention research.

Learning Areas:

Diversity and culture
Public health or related research
Social and behavioral sciences

Learning Objectives:
Describe the reasons why Thai parents may not support the waiver of guardian permission? Identify an adult proxy mechanism (for parents) in place to protect their children’s rights.

Keyword(s): International Health, Youth

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I have a PhD in epidemiology, postdoctoral training in social and behavioral sciences and have received several federal research grants.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.