142nd APHA Annual Meeting and Exposition

Annual Meeting Recordings are now available for purchase

300987
Neighborhood walkability of college environments to support active transportation and recreational physical activity

142nd APHA Annual Meeting and Exposition (November 15 - November 19, 2014): http://www.apha.org/events-and-meetings/annual
Monday, November 17, 2014

Andrew Peachey, DrPH , Department of Health Sciences, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA
Stephanie Baller, PhD , Department of Health Sciences, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA
Background: As undergraduate students transition from living on-campus to living off-campus to graduating, the built environment may influence the contribution of walking and cycling toward meeting physical activity recommendations.  It is important to understand how perceived environments differ to develop strategies that promote physical activity habits that can be maintained post-graduation. 

Methods: A cross-sectional analysis of 822 undergraduate students who completed the Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale-Abbreviated and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire was conducted during 2013.  Independent sample t-tests were used to compare NEWS-A subscale scores between on and off campus students.  Stepwise regression was used to predict physical activity using the NEW-A subscales.       

Results: Residential density (p=0.04), traffic hazards (p<0.001), and crime scores (p<0.001) were significantly lower among on-campus students while land-use mix diversity (p<0.001), aesthetics (p<0.001), infrastructure and safety for walking (p=0.001) and lack of parking scores (p=0.008) were significantly higher among on-campus students.   Active transportation accounted for 9.0% of total physical activity; recreational physical activity accounted for 41.1% of total physical activity.  After controlling for age, aesthetics (p=0.001) and lack of parking scores (p=0.02) were associated with walking for transportation while aesthetics (p =0.006) and (lack of) hilliness (p=0.008) were associated with total recreational physical activity.  

Conclusion: The on-campus and off-campus environments differ in ways which may impact the ability of students to achieve recommendations for physical activity through active transportation.  Strategies to promote continued active transportation and recreational physical activity are discussed.  

Learning Areas:

Environmental health sciences
Planning of health education strategies, interventions, and programs

Learning Objectives:
Compare the walkability of the on-campus neighborhood environment to the off-campus neighborhood environment. Describe strategies to increase physical activity among undergraduate students including environmental and behavioral change strategies.

Keyword(s): Built Environment, Physical Activity

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I have been the principal investigator or contributor to quantitative and qualitative research investigating the relationship between the built environment and health (physical activity and hypertension).
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.