142nd APHA Annual Meeting and Exposition

Annual Meeting Recordings are now available for purchase

301668
Neighborhood predictors of mammography screening among Latinas in Western Washington

142nd APHA Annual Meeting and Exposition (November 15 - November 19, 2014): http://www.apha.org/events-and-meetings/annual
Monday, November 17, 2014 : 10:50 AM - 11:10 AM

Yamile Molina, PhD , Department of Health Services/Cancer Prevention, University of Washington/Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
Shirley A.A. Beresford, PhD , Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Donald L. Patrick, PhD, MSPH , Center for Disability Policy & Research, Seattle Quality of Life Group, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Jesse Plascak, PhD , Department of Health Services/Cancer Prevention, University of Washington/Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
Gloria Coronado, PhD , Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Portland, OR
Background. Relatively little is known about if neighborhood contexts are associated with Latina’s mammography practices, despite an abundance of research documenting underutilization of screening among these women and a number of access and psychocultural barriers. 

Objective.Associations between neighborhood characteristics to barriers and plans to obtain a mammogram were examined among non-adherent U.S.-based Latinas.

Methods.As part of a larger study wih Sea Mar clinics, 539 Latinas completed a baseline questionnaire concerning barriers to mammography (cost, embarrassment) and plans to obtain a mammogram. Block group-level characteristics were abstracted from the American Community Survey (2007-2011), including %<HS, %unemployed, % <100% the federal poverty level, and median household income. Latino segregation Gini indices were calculated. Multivariable logistic regressions were conducted on quartiles (Q1-Q4).

Results.Women in higher educated neighborhoods (Q1) were less likely to report cost/access as a barrier relative to women in less educated neighborhoods, ORs for Q2 and Q3 = 0.5, 95%CI [0.3, 0.9], p < .05. Women living in higher educated neighborhoods (Q1) were also more likely to be planning to obtain a mammogram, Q2: OR = 3.0, 95%CI [1.3, 6.6], p = .008; Q3: OR =4.3, 95%CI[1.8, 10.1], p = .008.

Finally, women living in the most segregated neighborhoods (Q4) were more likely to report embarrassment, Q1: OR = 9.6, 95%CI [1.1, 80.7], p = .04. 

Discussion. The type of interventions that may be more effective for women, and Latinas specifically, might depend on their neighborhood characteristics. Future work is warranted to confirm associations and explore underlying mechanisms (e.g., social norms).

Learning Areas:

Chronic disease management and prevention
Diversity and culture
Planning of health education strategies, interventions, and programs
Public health or related education
Social and behavioral sciences

Learning Objectives:
Name neighborhood correlates of barriers and plans to obtain a mammogram among Latinas. Describe the implications of neighborhood research for determining the most effective interventions for specific communities of Latinas.

Keyword(s): Cancer and Women’s Health, Latinos

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I have been a postdoctoral research fellow for the past three years concerning breast cancer health disparities, with a focus on Latina health. I have given several oral and paper presentations on predictors of Latinas' mammography decisions.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.