142nd APHA Annual Meeting and Exposition

Annual Meeting Recordings are now available for purchase

302008
Que Vivan las Madres: An impact evaluation for a novel package of interventions targeting maternal and perinatal health in rural Guatemala

142nd APHA Annual Meeting and Exposition (November 15 - November 19, 2014): http://www.apha.org/events-and-meetings/annual
Wednesday, November 19, 2014 : 10:54 AM - 11:06 AM

Edgar Kestler, PhD , Centro de Investigación epidemiológica en salud sexual y reproductiva (CIESAR), Guatemala City, Guatemala
Julia Dettinger, MPH , Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Francesca Holme, MPH , Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Hector Lamadrid, MD, PhD , Instituto Nacional de Salud Publica, Mexico, Cuernavaca, Mexico
Alejandra Montoya, MSc , Instituto Nacional de Salud Publica, Mexico, Cuernavaca, Mexico
Marisela Olvera, CD, MSc , Instituto Nacional de Salud Publica, Mexico, Cuernavaca, Mexico
Sarah Zelek, MPH , Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Susanna Cohen, MSN, CNM , College of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City
Dilys Walker, MD , Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Background: Guatemala has one of the highest maternal mortality ratios in Latin America. While evidence supports a skilled birth attendant at delivery for improving pregnancy outcomes, only 52% of births are attended by skilled health personnel. Despite investment in 24-hour labor and delivery units, improvements in maternal and perinatal outcomes remain slow. The objective of this study is to measure the impact of a package of three interventions on perinatal mortality and maternal morbidity in Northern Guatemala.

Methods: We conducted a matched-pair cluster randomized control trial in four rural districts. Inclusion criteria was: 24-hour staffing, no operating room, at least 7 births per month, TBA in the community, and less than six-hours from the district commercial center.   Thirty clinics were matched on district, perinatal mortality, and delivery volume, and then randomized to the intervention or control group. The interventions included: PRONTO training course, a social marketing campaign, and the introduction of a professional midwife liaison between clinics and TBAs. Data was collected at baseline, during implementation, and for one-year follow-up. The primary outcomes were: change in perinatal mortality; change in maternal morbidity; and change in proportion of institutional births.

Results: Outcome data from 17,302 obstetric events were collected over eighteen-months of the study.  Using a difference-in-difference approach, a 9.4% increase in births was recorded at intervention facilities compared with control facilities (95% CI: 1.3, 18.3; p: 0.022).

Discussion: Improving maternal and perinatal outcomes requires complex approaches.  This project developed a package of diverse, innovative interventions and preliminary evidence shows impact.

Learning Areas:

Conduct evaluation related to programs, research, and other areas of practice
Implementation of health education strategies, interventions and programs

Learning Objectives:
Describe the context for maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality in Guatemala; Discuss an innovative intervention package aimed at improving maternal and child health outcomes

Keyword(s): Birth Outcomes, Evaluation

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I will be taking a lead role in writing the manuscript related to these results and have worked with this project (focusing on questions related to data and methods) for the past two years.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.