142nd APHA Annual Meeting and Exposition

Annual Meeting Recordings are now available for purchase

303625
Utilization of Clinical Preventive Services Among Persons with Different Types of Disabilities

142nd APHA Annual Meeting and Exposition (November 15 - November 19, 2014): http://www.apha.org/events-and-meetings/annual
Wednesday, November 19, 2014 : 12:30 PM - 12:45 PM

Charles Drum, MPA, JD, PhD , Institute on Disability, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH
Kimberly Phillips, MA , Institute on Disability, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH
Background and Importance

Use of recommended clinical preventive services (CPS) reduces morbidity and mortality from preventable conditions for all populations.  Disparities have been found in utilization of some CPS among people with disabilities, compared to people without disabilities; however considerable variability in type of CPS examined, design, sample, and results impedes understanding of these disparities.  To elucidate, we compared recommended utilization of four CPS among persons with different disability types using data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS).  The MEPS is a nationally representative dataset widely used in health care research. 

Methods & Results

Using pooled data from the 2004–2010 MEPS, we examined utilization of four CPS (mammogram, Papanicolaou test, dental check-up, and flu vaccine) among five disability types (physical, cognitive, visual, hearing, and multiple) and the non-disabled population.  With regression models based on the Andersen Behavioral Model, we considered individual- and systems-level factors relating to receipt of CPS by disability type. 

 Statistically significant differences in utilization were present in each CPS area, including some higher and some lower rates depending on disability type and CPS.  Underutilization occurred most frequently for dental check-ups, Papanicolaou tests, and mammograms.  Logistic regressions showed that the predictive value of individual and systems-level factors varied widely across disability type.             

Conclusion

Persons with disabilities experience some disparities in CPS use compared to the non-disabled population. Considering type of disability is necessary to determine which factors contribute to receipt and non-receipt of CPS and is similarly advised when designing interventions to improve CPS utilization rates.

Learning Areas:

Clinical medicine applied in public health
Implementation of health education strategies, interventions and programs
Provision of health care to the public

Learning Objectives:
Describe CPS use among different disability types and the non-disabled population. Identify disparities in CPS utilization. Describe individual and systems-level predictors of CPS use among persons with different types of disabilities.

Keyword(s): Disabilities, Preventive Medicine

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am a recognized expert in health disparities research and the Principal Investigator of the study, as well as multiple other federally funded research projects.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.