142nd APHA Annual Meeting and Exposition

Annual Meeting Recordings are now available for purchase

303906
Evaluation of a nutrition program delivered to Mississippi elementary students during subsidized field trips to a community-based children's health education center

142nd APHA Annual Meeting and Exposition (November 15 - November 19, 2014): http://www.apha.org/events-and-meetings/annual
Tuesday, November 18, 2014 : 12:30 PM - 12:50 PM

Kathleen Ragsdale, PhD , Social Science Research Center, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS
Ginger Cross, PhD , Social Science Research Center, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS
Sarah E. Pellegrine, BA , Social Science Research Center, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS
Sara Gallman, MS , Social Science Research Center, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS
Background: At 41%, Mississippi has one of the highest overweight/obesity percentages in the US among students in grades K-12 (Kolbo et al, 2012). The effectiveness of community-based nutrition programming delivered to elementary-aged children via children’s museums and health education centers has been under-studied. HealthWorks! is a community-based children’s health education center whose mission is to improve health and nutrition knowledge among Mississippi children. One way HealthWorks! fulfills its mission is through nutrition education programs delivered to elementary students from rural and low-resource schools during subsidized field trips to HealthWorks!. Methods: In Fall 2012, 3rd-, 4th-, and 5th-graders (N=1,000) from 11 schools were recruited to participate in field trips and pre- and post-tests to evaluate the Be a Food Groupie (BAFG) program. BAFG is an interactive nutrition education program designed to equip children with “‘smart-food-know-how’ on choosing whole grains, reading food labels, and avoiding portion distortion.” The evaluation used a constructed matched comparison group design in which ‘intervention’ schools and ‘control’ schools were matched based on percentage of: 1) economically disadvantaged students; 2) minority students; 3) students ‘proficient’ on the Mississippi Curriculum Test 2 for language proficiency. Intervention students received the pre-test, BAFG, and post-test. Comparison students received the pre-test, post-test, and BAFG. Results: Eighty-three percent of intervention students had improved scores from pre- to post-test (M=15.57, SD=13.25) compared to 45% of comparison students (M=2.76, SD=21.67). An ANOVA calculated on difference in test score was significant at p=0.00. Discussion: Implications for community-based interactive health education programs targeting school-aged children are discussed.

Learning Areas:

Conduct evaluation related to programs, research, and other areas of practice
Implementation of health education strategies, interventions and programs
Planning of health education strategies, interventions, and programs
Program planning
Social and behavioral sciences

Learning Objectives:
Describe pre-test and post-test results of a constructed matched comparison evaluation of a community-based nutrition program delivered to elementary students in Mississippi. Discuss implications for interactive health education programs targeting school-aged children.

Keyword(s): Community Health Centers, Evaluation

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I have conducted international and domestic research on the social determinants of health among minority/vulnerable populations for over 15 years. Research areas include nutrition education, infant health, teen pregnancy prevention, eHealth interventions, CBPR, and program evaluation. My publications have appeared in journals such as Social Science & Medicine, Sexuality Research & Social Policy, Journal of Sex Research, Case Studies in Strategic Communication, Journal of School Health, and the Journal of Community Health.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.