Annual Meeting Recordings are now available for purchase
303947
Health systems change for tobacco dependence screening and treatment: Measuring progress at the state level
Tuesday, November 18, 2014
Betty Brown, MPH
,
Public Health Policy Research Program, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC
Haven Battles, PhD
,
Bureau of Chronic Disease Evaluation and Research, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY
Ann Wendland, MSL
,
Bureau of Tobacco Control, New York State Department of Health, Rochester, NY
Sara Phelps, MS
,
Tobacco Control Program, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY
Promoting health systems change is a key tobacco cessation strategy. Healthcare systems relevant for tobacco-related interventions include written policies and standards of care, health record systems, referral processes, and audit procedures. Challenges associated with implementing and evaluating health systems change interventions include clearly defining “systems” and prioritizing target organizations. For example, mental health treatment facilities are less likely to use written policies than hospitals, but their patients/clients are more likely to be tobacco users. Moreover, assessing systems change at the state level requires a systematic approach, distinct from the qualitative approach feasible within a single organization. We will discuss how we translated the evidence base into a conceptual model that articulates the systems change intervention’s theory of change. Using our conceptual model facilitated our evaluation planning by outlining intervention components and short-term and intermediate outcomes. We will discuss the health systems change initiative in New York (NY), now in its tenth year. One of our studies found that 90.3% of NY community health centers (CHCs) use written clinical policies or procedures, but only 51.6% of CHCs have written clinical policies or procedures related to tobacco. We will highlight recommendations to respond to challenges encountered in health systems change intervention and evaluation, including the importance of prioritizing targets to optimize reach to the target population and maximize program efficiency. For example, our evaluation determined that NY’s intensive evidence-based intervention was reaching a low proportion of practices in the state; shifting the target increased the likelihood of significantly changing cessation outcomes.
Learning Areas:
Conduct evaluation related to programs, research, and other areas of practice
Public health or related organizational policy, standards, or other guidelines
Learning Objectives:
Identify challenges to measuring health systems change progress at the state level.
Describe the evidence base for tobacco cessation-focused health systems change.
Articulate the theory of change for health systems change interventions.
List health systems change evaluation methods that match intervention approaches.
Keyword(s): Tobacco Control, Evaluation
Presenting author's disclosure statement:Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I have led evaluation studies focused on tobacco-related health systems change for the evaluation of New York State's Tobacco Control Program for seven years. In collaboration with Program staff, I have adapted our evaluation approach to ensure that it is aligned with the state's intervention activities and that we respond to new evidence in the field. I have also led similar studies in Florida and North Dakota.
Any relevant financial relationships? No
I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines,
and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed
in my presentation.