142nd APHA Annual Meeting and Exposition

Annual Meeting Recordings are now available for purchase

304697
Cross-site evaluation of different community efforts to improve diabetes self-management among African-American women

142nd APHA Annual Meeting and Exposition (November 15 - November 19, 2014): http://www.apha.org/events-and-meetings/annual
Monday, November 17, 2014 : 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM

Jerry A. Schultz, PhD , KU Work Group for Community Health and Development, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS
Jomella Watson-Thompson, PhD , Department of Applied Behavioral Science/ KU Work Group for Community Health and Development, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS
Stephen Fawcett, PhD , KU Work Group for Community Health and Development, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS
Patricia Doykos, PhD , Together on Diabetes, Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation, New York, NY
Jenna Hunter, MPH , Work Group for Community Health and Development, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS
Ithar Hassaballa, B.S. , Work Group for Community Health and Development, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, KS
Charles Sepers Jr., B.S. , Work Group for Community Health and Development, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS
Background: Starting in 2010, the Together on Diabetes (TOD) engaged five innovative approaches to improving diabetes self-management (DSME) among African-American women. The projects used somewhat distinct approaches to enhancing outreach and referral, quality of care, DSME and support, and community/system change. A participatory evaluation approach was used.

Methods: The aims of the evaluation were to: a) understand what is being accomplished within and among projects, b) improve performance, and c) assess the impacts of the initiative. This required engaging grantees in development of a logic model and key evaluation questions, systematically documenting the program and the impact of the intervention, and utilizing data for program improvement and decision making. The overall initiative: 1) developed an evaluation plan and online documentation and support system to monitor strategic approaches and accomplishments; 2) fully implemented participatory evaluation with all grantees; 3) conducted systematic reflection with project partners and foundation staff; and 4) presented a summative evaluation of the effort.

Results: The patterns across projects showed widespread use of DSME, predominantly delivered through community health workers, as well as differential use of social support integrated in health services. The five projects enrolled a total of 760 participants. Four of the five projects showed improvement in average A1c levels or in the proportion of participants at high risk (A1c > 9.0%).

Conclusions: Participatory evaluation can help implementation of key strategies and measure project impact. In this cross-site evaluation, strategies implemented by the TOD projects were associated with small to modest improvement in diabetes-related health outcomes.

Learning Areas:

Conduct evaluation related to programs, research, and other areas of practice
Implementation of health education strategies, interventions and programs
Public health or related education

Learning Objectives:
Describe how participatory evaluation can help improve implementation of diabetes self-management initiatives. Analyze the results of different diabetes self-management approaches. Describe the outcomes of the different approaches to diabetes promoting self-management among African American women.

Keyword(s): Diabetes, Self-Management

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I have been the principal or co-principal of multiple federally and foundation funded grants focusing on the coalition development, chronic disease prevention and substance abuse prevention. Among my interests are developing our understanding of the factors that contribute to successful community change and building capacity to improve community public health efforts.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.