307905
Engaging priority populations in tobacco control advocacy and policy: The LAAMPP experience
Methods: LAAMPP was implemented for the third time beginning in 2012, and is currently being evaluated. Methods include baseline and follow up assessment of Fellows’ skills, pre- and post- key informant interviews with each Fellow, interviews with community contacts, case studies of projects undertaken by Fellows, and a Social Network Analysis. Baseline data was collected in fall 2012 at the beginning of the Institute; follow up data collection will take place in spring 2014 after the Capstone Summit, with analysis completed by September 2014.
This presentation will focus on two main findings from the evaluation: the extent to which participation in LAAMPP increased Fellows’ capacity and confidence to engage in policy work, including data and examples of actions Fellows engaged in, and the extent to which Fellows’ tobacco control networks were expanded.
Learning Areas:
Advocacy for health and health educationDiversity and culture
Learning Objectives:
Explain the need for leadership development opportunities including skill development for priority population communities
Describe the outcomes of a structured leadership institute’s contribution to the development of policy advocacy skills among participants representing priority populations
Keyword(s): Advocacy, Health Disparities/Inequities
Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: As the evaluator for the LAAMPP project, I have a PhD in Evaluation Studies and extensive professional experience evaluating public health initiatives. I am past chair of the ATOD section and have served as a moderator and presenter for many APHA ATOD section oral sessions.
Any relevant financial relationships? No
I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.