307991
Logic modeling for measuring performance in clinical research programs
Learning Areas:
Administration, management, leadershipProgram planning
Public health administration or related administration
Systems thinking models (conceptual and theoretical models), applications related to public health
Learning Objectives:
Explain logic modeling as a necessary precursor to performance measurement, including conceptual and methodological techniques for developing logic models, and their application to strategic planning, quality improvement, performance management, and program evaluation.
Identify examples of logic models applicable to performance metrics, which may include process effectiveness outcomes, leadership outcomes, and workforce-focused outcomes.
Describe components of logic models that can be used in scientific research, including pathways to collection of quantitative and qualitative data via focus group and survey methodologies, and multifactorial analysis that will be used to identify appropriate performance indicators.
Identify comparison measures against which the performance of a program can be assessed. Comparison reference points may include prior measures of performance (baseline) and recognized standards of industry performance (benchmarking).
Discuss efforts to develop logic models that can identify objective Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and provide quantifiable data that will enable leadership to prioritize, and optimally align/utilize resources.
Explain why logic models should include, and be enriched with, data gathered from several sources, using a variety of appropriate collection methods and instruments.
Demonstrate how an effective logic model should produce metrics that provide data-driven assessments of performance and productivity and information about contextual factors to answer the “Why” and “How” questions that should accompany routine performance measurement.
Discuss the need for computer software that can automate and expedite logic modeling, and the need for expertise in adapting existing software to an organization’s specific needs.
Keyword(s): Evaluation, Clinical Trials
Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: Among my scientific interests and areas of scholarship and practice are program development, performance measurement, and evaluation practice. I am the lead author of an evaluation protocol for the development of performance measures for diverse clinical research programs and networks in domestic and global settings. I hold a Certificate in Evaluation Practice from The Evaluators' Institute at George Washington University.
Any relevant financial relationships? No
I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.