142nd APHA Annual Meeting and Exposition

Annual Meeting Recordings are now available for purchase

309743
Measuring and Evaluating Injury and Violence Prevention Capacity: The Base Integration Component (BIC) of the CDC Core Violence Injury Prevention Program (Core VIPP)

142nd APHA Annual Meeting and Exposition (November 15 - November 19, 2014): http://www.apha.org/events-and-meetings/annual
Monday, November 17, 2014

Jamila Porter, MPH , Safe States Alliance, Atlanta, GA
Shenee Reid, MPH, MPA , Safe States Alliance, Atlanta, GA
Amber Williams , Safe States Alliance, Atlanta, GA
Andrea C. Gielen, ScD, ScM , Center for Injury Research and Policy, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
Brandon Nesbit, MPH , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control
Sally Thigpen, MPA , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control
Natalie Wilkins, PhD , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control
Purpose: The Core Violence and Injury Prevention Program (Core VIPP) Basic Integration Component (BIC) funds 20 state health department (SHD) injury and violence prevention programs (IVPPs) to enhance their organizational capacity to implement and evaluate evidence-based programs and policies. It is hypothesized that BIC-funded SHD/IVPPs will increase or maintain the capacity needed to achieve health impact in key IVP areas (measured using SMART objectives). The Evaluation Team (Safe States, SAVIR, and CDC) is evaluating the BIC program by measuring the capacity of BIC states and investigating the relationship between capacity and health impact. This presentation will describe the innovative approach used to define and measure SHD/IVPP capacity. Methodology: Through a systematic process involving literature reviews, data examinations, and consultations with IVP professionals, nine indicators of capacity were identified as necessary to implement BIC:  Workforce; Funding; State Strategic Plans; Use of Surveillance Data; Dissemination of Surveillance Data; Use of Evaluation Findings; Dissemination of Evaluation Findings; Collaboration; and Strategies.  Results: Based on the capacity indicators, a questionnaire and interview protocol was created, and a detailed scoring system was developed to measure overall capacity across indicators. Data is collected annually to monitor and track capacity over time. Examples will be shared to illustrate the usefulness of these data. Conclusions: It is important and feasible to identify and measure SHD/IVPP organizational capacity.  The indicators have better equipped the Evaluation Team to provide technical assistance to SHD/IVPPs to implement BIC activities.  Next step: To investigate the relationship between capacity indicators and achievement of SMART objective measures.

Learning Areas:

Administer health education strategies, interventions and programs
Conduct evaluation related to programs, research, and other areas of practice
Systems thinking models (conceptual and theoretical models), applications related to public health

Learning Objectives:
Discuss the theoretical connections between organizational capacity and health impact in public health programs Explain the innovative methods used to measure the organizational capacity of state injury and violence prevention programs funded through BIC Describe the nine indicators identified to measure changes in state injury and violence prevention program capacity over time Discuss how the ability to measure and track organizational capacity has equipped evaluators to provide technical assistance necessary to BIC program implementation

Keyword(s): Evaluation, Violence & Injury Prevention

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am the Director of Programs and Evaluation at the Safe States Alliance. I provide senior-level leadership of organizational initiatives and projects across various injury and violence prevention topic areas. I lead the Safe States Alliance's Program & Evaluation Team, which has been tasked with conducting an evaluation of the CDC Core Violence and Injury Prevention Program (Core VIPP).
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.

Back to: 3305.0: Violence-related injuries