Annual Meeting Recordings are now available for purchase
309784
Evaluating Community Knowledge and Intended Behavior Change as a Result of North Carolina's Recent Harm Reduction Laws: SB20 and HB850
Tuesday, November 18, 2014
Ariana Katz, MPH
,
Women's Global Health Imperative, RTI International, San Francisco, CA
Phil Hanson, MPH/MCRP candidate 2015
,
Gillings School of Global Public Health, Health Behavior Department, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
Sayaka Hino, MPH
,
Gillings School of Global Public Health, Health Behavior Department, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
Michael Wilson, MPH
,
Gillings School of Global Public Health, Health Behavior Department, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
Casey McCormick, MPH
,
Gillings School of Global Public Health, Health Behavior Department, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
Kristina Felder, MPH
,
Gillings School of Global Public Health, Health Behavior Department, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
Unintentional drug overdose is the second leading cause of accidental injury death in North Carolina (NC). In 2013, NC passed SB20: Good Samaritan/Naloxone Access and HB850: Possession of Needles/Tell Law Officer. Community knowledge and intended behavior change as a result of these laws was evaluated. Thirty-nine brief qualitative interviews were conducted in Durham, Chapel Hill and Charlotte, NC using purposive sampling. After hearing scenarios pertaining to SB20 and HB850, participants were asked how they would respond. The SB20 scenarios described a heroin overdose, and the HB850 scenario described a police search of an individual with a syringe. Analysis of descriptive statistics occurred in SAS and review of behavioral responses in Excel. Just 15.38% of participants knew they could not be prosecuted for a small amount of drugs if they called for help during an overdose. Despite that lack of knowledge, 92.31% would call for help. While 83.87% of participants would administer naloxone to an overdose victim if trained, only 51.28% knew they would be protected from civil liability for doing so. Finally, while 32.44% knew they could not be charged for paraphernalia if surrendered needles before a search, 67.86% would tell a law enforcement office they were carrying a syringe. Despite lacking knowledge of new policies, most participants would call for help during an overdose, would use naloxone if trained, and would tell an officer they had a syringe. More community education regarding changes to drug policies is needed along with more research to determine the impact of these laws.
Learning Areas:
Public health or related public policy
Learning Objectives:
Discuss the role of harm reduction drug policy on changing community behavior.
Identify the importance of disseminating policy changes to the community.
Keyword(s): Drug Abuse Prevention and Safety, Health Law
Presenting author's disclosure statement:Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I received an MPH in May of 2014 from the Gillings School of Global Public Health at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. This is a presentation of my capstone master's project I completed with five other MPH students. I have 5 years experience working with harm reduction practices and over 8 years working in the field of HIV/AIDS.
Any relevant financial relationships? No
I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines,
and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed
in my presentation.