142nd APHA Annual Meeting and Exposition

Annual Meeting Recordings are now available for purchase

310095
Conducting quasi-experimental evaluation research in the real world: Evaluating the community transformation grant's smoke-free multi-unit housing initiative

142nd APHA Annual Meeting and Exposition (November 15 - November 19, 2014): http://www.apha.org/events-and-meetings/annual
Sunday, November 16, 2014

Karen Palmersheim, PhD, MS, MSW, BS , Center for Urban Initiatives and Research, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
Terry Batson, MA , Center for Urban Initiatives and Research, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
Lynn Hrabik, MPH, RD, CD , Wisconsin Clearinghouse for Prevention Resources, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Pulaski, WI
Luongo Sarah, BA , Center for Urban Initiatives and Research, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
Randall Glysch, MS , Tobacco Prevention and Control Program, Wisconsin Division of Public Health, Madison, WI
Background:  During Fall, 2011, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention awarded the Community Transformation Grant (CTG) which seeks to build community capacity to prevent chronic disease.  Funds support communities as they pursue evidence-based strategies to prevent obesity, reduce tobacco use, and improve screening for high blood pressure and cholesterol.  Wisconsin was awarded a five-year CTG.

Wisconsin's initiative focuses on changing systems and policies that create opportunities to make healthy choices in three important areas: tobacco-free living, healthy food systems, and active communities.  Thirty Wisconsin communities (grantees) are receiving funding to support these efforts.  In total, the projects will reach more than 2.6 million people in Wisconsin, or about half of the state’s population.  The purpose of this session is to share the evaluation research being conducted in the tobacco-free living arm of the initiative.

The Evaluation:  The evaluation consists of a quasi-experimental design, with a treatment group (communities that are being targeted for intervention as part of the CTG project) and a comparison group (matched communities that are not part of the CTG project).  Baseline and follow-up data collection are being conducted via telephone interviews, mailed surveys, and performance-based instruments completed by grantees in each targeted community.

This session will discuss the research design, data collection instruments, and baseline findings of the evaluation.  Strengths and challenges associated with various aspects of the evaluation will be shared, along with lessons learned and strategies for dealing with the challenges associated with conducting program evaluation research in the real world.

Learning Areas:

Conduct evaluation related to programs, research, and other areas of practice
Public health or related research

Learning Objectives:
Discuss the importance of conducting quality evaluation research on public health promotion initiatives. Demonstrate how to design a quasi-experimental evaluation. Assess the strengths and challenges of conducting a quasi-experimental evaluation. Formulate strategies for dealing with the challenges associated with conducting quasi-experimental evaluations in the real world.

Keyword(s): Evaluation, Tobacco Control

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: As an evaluation practitioner for almost 20 years, I have served as principal investigator on dozens of community-based evaluations ranging in design from simple outcome monitoring to quasi-experimental. In addition to the evaluation for this poster presentation, which is a multi-site, CDC-funded program, I am currently the PI/co-PI on three other federally-funded evaluations through the university research center at which I serve as director. Evaluating public health and social service interventions is my specialty area.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.