310095
Conducting quasi-experimental evaluation research in the real world: Evaluating the community transformation grant's smoke-free multi-unit housing initiative
Wisconsin's initiative focuses on changing systems and policies that create opportunities to make healthy choices in three important areas: tobacco-free living, healthy food systems, and active communities. Thirty Wisconsin communities (grantees) are receiving funding to support these efforts. In total, the projects will reach more than 2.6 million people in Wisconsin, or about half of the state’s population. The purpose of this session is to share the evaluation research being conducted in the tobacco-free living arm of the initiative.
The Evaluation: The evaluation consists of a quasi-experimental design, with a treatment group (communities that are being targeted for intervention as part of the CTG project) and a comparison group (matched communities that are not part of the CTG project). Baseline and follow-up data collection are being conducted via telephone interviews, mailed surveys, and performance-based instruments completed by grantees in each targeted community.
This session will discuss the research design, data collection instruments, and baseline findings of the evaluation. Strengths and challenges associated with various aspects of the evaluation will be shared, along with lessons learned and strategies for dealing with the challenges associated with conducting program evaluation research in the real world.
Learning Areas:
Conduct evaluation related to programs, research, and other areas of practicePublic health or related research
Learning Objectives:
Discuss the importance of conducting quality evaluation research on public health promotion initiatives.
Demonstrate how to design a quasi-experimental evaluation.
Assess the strengths and challenges of conducting a quasi-experimental evaluation.
Formulate strategies for dealing with the challenges associated with conducting quasi-experimental evaluations in the real world.
Keyword(s): Evaluation, Tobacco Control
Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: As an evaluation practitioner for almost 20 years, I have served as principal investigator on dozens of community-based evaluations ranging in design from simple outcome monitoring to quasi-experimental. In addition to the evaluation for this poster presentation, which is a multi-site, CDC-funded program, I am currently the PI/co-PI on three other federally-funded evaluations through the university research center at which I serve as director. Evaluating public health and social service interventions is my specialty area.
Any relevant financial relationships? No
I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.