142nd APHA Annual Meeting and Exposition

Annual Meeting Recordings are now available for purchase

310507
When IRBs fall short: Creating a cultural safety system for community based participatory research with American Indians

142nd APHA Annual Meeting and Exposition (November 15 - November 19, 2014): http://www.apha.org/events-and-meetings/annual
Tuesday, November 18, 2014 : 2:50 PM - 3:10 PM

Christina Pacheco, JD , Center for American Indian Community Health and Department of Family Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS
Sean Daley, PhD, MA , Center for American Indian Studies, Johnson County Community College, Overland Park, KS
Jason Hale, MA , Center for American Indian Community Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS
Travis Brown, BA , Center for American Indian Community Health and Department of Family Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS
Byron Gajewski, PhD , Center for American Indian Community Health and Department of Biostatistics, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS
Christine Makosky Daley, PhD, MA, SM , Center for American Indian Community Health and Department of Family Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS
Issue: American Indians (AI) have some of the poorest documented health outcomes of all racial/ethnic groups in the US. Research is necessary to evaluate and create effective clinical and public health approaches to address these outcomes. Historical and recent events have generated mistrust of research among AI. To address these concerns, the Center for American Indian Community Health (CAICH) created a cultural review and monitoring committee (CRMC) to supplement our institutional review board (IRB).  Purpose: In collaboration with the IRB, CAICH-CRMC reviews all human subject research that proposes to work with AI to ensure that AI’s cultures, values and wishes are respected.  Description: CAICH-CRMC has twelve members. It is comprised of nine AI community members, one AI researcher and two non-AI researchers. The two non-AI committee members, skilled in CBPR with expertise in qualitative and quantitative methods, serve as the scientific reviewers but do not vote on the cultural aspects reviewed by the committee. The AI committee members review all protocols, consent forms, data collection instruments, CBPR plans, and written materials to be seen or heard by AI participants. The committee comments on the cultural appropriateness of recruitment plans and data collection tools. Additionally, it reviews biospecimen collection, particularly what is collected/tested, where specimens are stored, and what happens to them at study end. Provisos are issued that must be address prior to receiving approval. Lessons Learned: CAICH-CRMC has received favorable feedback from the AI community and has been a positive step towards addressing AI’s concerns about unethical research.

Learning Areas:

Advocacy for health and health education
Diversity and culture
Ethics, professional and legal requirements
Public health or related research

Learning Objectives:
Discuss the importance of learning and respecting a community’s history, culture, values, and wishes when engaging in research with that community. Explain the steps taken to create a cultural review and monitoring committee to supplement an institutional review board.

Keyword(s): Native Americans, Community-Based Research (CBPR)

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I have lead the development of the Cultural Review and Monitoring Committee for the Center for American Indian Community Health at the University of Kansas Medical Center. I have also managed a longitudinal cohort study for four years and worked in the field of law and policy for more than six years. I have spent the last four years working on research ethics and research participants' rights.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.