Annual Meeting Recordings are now available for purchase
310551
Developing and implementing a Community Empowerment Center to build local capacity for community-level change
Monday, November 17, 2014
Ronald Pitner, PhD
,
College of Social Work, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC
Darcy Freedman, MPH, PhD
,
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
Patricia A. Sharpe, PhD, MPH
,
Prevention Research Center, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC
Jennie Ann Cole, MA
,
College of Social Work, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC
Shanna Hastie, LMSW
,
University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC
BACKGROUND: Health disparities research is increasingly influenced by two paradigms: community-based participatory research (CBPR) and social determinants of health (SDOH). CBPR calls for collaborative research relationships that empower communities to co-generate research programs while SDOH perspectives focus on macro-level, “upstream” factors influencing health. The purpose of this study was to utilize a CBPR approach to address SDOH among residents of a public-housing community and adjacent neighborhood in Columbia, SC. METHODS: A mini-grant program was developed to encourage community members to develop community-level, community-engaged interventions focused on creating a healthier environment. A six-session training program guided community members in proposal development, with 25 individuals attending at least one session. RESULTS: Six proposals were submitted for external peer-review. Proposals were scored according to the degree of widespread community benefit, effective community engagement, and feasibility of implementation within a 6-month timeframe. Submitted proposals focused on food security (n=2), exercise (n=1), computer literacy (n=2), and community advocacy (n=2). The three awarded interventions focused on food security, exercise, and community advocacy. Each awardee team received $12,000 for implementation over six months. Additionally, a community garden was implemented in the community. The four interventions were evaluated collectively using a quasi-experimental design to assess their ability to increase community participation among residents. CONCLUSIONS: Community-generated, community-level, and community-engaged interventions provide community members with opportunities to address neighborhood concerns within a locale-specific context. The findings provide guidance for engaging community members in the development of community level interventions.
Learning Areas:
Assessment of individual and community needs for health education
Implementation of health education strategies, interventions and programs
Learning Objectives:
Identify key components of a community capacity-building process implemented in a public housing community and adjacent low-income neighborhood.
Discuss lessons learned and implications for future academic-community partnerships.
Keyword(s): Community-Based Research (CBPR), Social Work
Presenting author's disclosure statement:Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I served as the Director of the Community Empowerment Center and was involved with every aspect of the intervention's implementation. I also assisted in the development of several intervention components.
Any relevant financial relationships? No
I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines,
and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed
in my presentation.