Annual Meeting Recordings are now available for purchase
310761
Evaluation of the Regulatory Paradigm for Testing Antimicrobials for Use in Clinical Settings
Tuesday, November 18, 2014
Evelyn Alvarez, MPH
,
Environmental Health Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
Hilary Godwin, PhD
,
Department of Environmental Health Sciences, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA
On December 16, 2013, the Food and Drug Administration proposed a rule that would require manufacturers to provide more evidence to demonstrate the effectiveness of antibacterial soaps. The laboratory tests used to evaluate the effectiveness of antibacterial soaps do not directly take into account the effect of a product on infection rates. Similarly, manufacturers of antimicrobials for use in hospitals, which are under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, are not currently required to conduct studies that directly test the ability of an antimicrobial to be clinically beneficial. Furthermore, there are no detailed standards in place to guide approval of antimicrobial products for healthcare settings. A hospital environment can be a short-term or a long-term home for many immunocompromised patients including children and elderly who can be exposed to healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). Antimicrobial products play an important role in preventing HAIs, however, an antimicrobial product that kills pathogens in vitro does not necessarily translate into decreasing the incidence of HAIs in humans. Differences between how the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the public interpret the use of “antimicrobial” is exemplified in the registration of copper as the first “antimicrobial surface.” Here, we summarize the regulatory paradigm that was used to register copper as an antimicrobial surface under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA). We also provide an analysis of the current guidelines in action for hospital cleaning practices as well as an analysis of the differences between clinical and environmental use of the term “antimicrobial.” We recommend employing a standardized efficacy testing protocol specifically designed for surfaces and not just conventional antimicrobial agents that is based on stringent, evidence-based hospital cleaning standards. We conclude that the selection of antimicrobials in infection control practice in hospital settings should be based upon the best evidence available.
Learning Areas:
Conduct evaluation related to programs, research, and other areas of practice
Environmental health sciences
Public health or related laws, regulations, standards, or guidelines
Public health or related organizational policy, standards, or other guidelines
Public health or related public policy
Public health or related research
Learning Objectives:
Evaluate the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's antimicrobial certification program.
Explain the differences between the clinical and environmental use of the term "antimicrobial."
Assess the lack of clinical evidence surrounding the registration of copper as an antimicrobial surface.
Keyword(s): Public Policy, Evidence-Based Practice
Presenting author's disclosure statement:Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am a doctoral student who has been conducting research in the field of antimicrobial policy, which is my primary dissertation focus. Before starting work on antimicrobial policy, I was conducting other public health policy related work for various different projects including one centered on alternative analysis.
Any relevant financial relationships? No
I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines,
and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed
in my presentation.