142nd APHA Annual Meeting and Exposition

Annual Meeting Recordings are now available for purchase

311208
Social capital, neighborhood disadvantage and potentially preventable emergency department visits in metropolitan Baltimore

142nd APHA Annual Meeting and Exposition (November 15 - November 19, 2014): http://www.apha.org/events-and-meetings/annual
Tuesday, November 18, 2014

Gina Rowe, PhD, DNP, MPH, FNP-BC, PHCNS-BC , School of Nursing, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD
Purpose:  This study aimed to: 1) describe variation in neighborhood-level social determinants of health (e.g., poverty, diversity); 2) measure geographic variance in potentially preventable emergency department (ED) visit (PPV) rates explained by these determinants; and 3) examine whether neighborhood-level social capital can mediate the impact of living in a disadvantaged neighborhood on PPV rates.

Significance:  Care delivered in EDs is more expensive than out-patient primary care, but at least one in ten U.S. ED visits and about a third of Maryland ED visits are potentially preventable. Geographic variation in PPV rates reflects differences in primary care access and social determinants of health-seeking behavior, with higher rates noted in poor communities. Health inequities and primary care barriers are implicated in these higher rates.

Design:  Social disorganization mediated by social capital theory guided this cross-sectional, ecologic analysis of PPV rate variation in 130 zip code tabulation areas of the Baltimore metropolitan statistical area. This secondary data analysis used Poisson and geographically weighted regression to analyze aggregated data from three public sources.

Results: Significant predictors of PPV rate variance included percentage of people with income less than twice the poverty level, percentage of households receiving public assistance, and female-headed households. Primary care physicians per capita and percent uninsured were not significant predictors. Social capital was a significant partial mediator of all potential predictors reviewed. Factor analysis revealed two components of social capital; social cohesion/trust, but not collective action, remained a significant mediator.

Discussion:  Communities with high social capital may offer health-protective benefits to residents, even mediating the negative impacts of living in a disadvantaged neighborhood.  Reducing PPVs will require consideration of population-level health-seeking behaviors and promotion of neighborhood-level social capital, particularly for single mothers.

Learning Areas:

Assessment of individual and community needs for health education
Epidemiology
Provision of health care to the public
Public health or related nursing
Public health or related research
Social and behavioral sciences

Learning Objectives:
Define social capital. Describe components of neighborhood disadvantage. Discuss how social capital may mediate the negative impact of neighborhood disadvantage on rates of potentially preventable emergency department visits.

Keyword(s): Health Disparities/Inequities, Geographic Information Systems (GIS)

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I have taught epidemiology and community/public health nursing at both the undergraduate and graduate levels. This presentation is based on research for my PhD dissertation. My scientific interests include social capital, social determinants of health, place-based health disparities, and health promotion strategies.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.