142nd APHA Annual Meeting and Exposition

Annual Meeting Recordings are now available for purchase

311346
From Concept to Action: Actively Engaging Communities in Building Disaster Resilience

142nd APHA Annual Meeting and Exposition (November 15 - November 19, 2014): http://www.apha.org/events-and-meetings/annual
Monday, November 17, 2014

Jesse C. Bliss, MPH , LLU Center for Public Health Preparedness, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA
Rachel Long, MPH, CEPR , Office of Public Health Practice, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA
Biblia Kim, MPH , School of Public Health- Office of Public Health Practice, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA
Robin Smith, PhD , School of Public Health-Office of Public Health Practice, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA
Samuel Soret, PhD, MPH , School of Public Health, Center for Community Resilience, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA
Background/purpose. Community resilience is rapidly emerging as the primary, overarching target of public health programs throughout the nation, yet within communities themselves the term resilience can be difficult to concretize.  Understanding the concept to becoming resilient is different from traditional preparedness. Some public health agencies are challenged by how to communicate the concept of resilience with communities. Successful approaches to building community resilience must facilitate operationalizing the concept of resilience into the social fabric of communities through routine activities.

Methods: The Los Angeles County Community Disaster Resilience Project (LACCDR) leveraged Loma Linda University's existing toolkit and adapted it with core ideas about resilience surfaced through LACCDR community surveys and workgroups.  The new toolkit incorporates four levers of resilience as identified by Chandra et al. in 2011 to explicitly guide the framework of resilience throughout the sections. The toolkit and community engagement model were implemented in 8 community coalitions across LA County.

Results: Responses to sections of the toolkit have been very positive as they learned more about what resilience is and how to help strengthen their communities. The hands on practice-based learning approach used by the toolkit resonated well with participants. Challenges were faced in maintaining interest among local communities and agencies during the development phase.

Conclusion: The use of CBPR to develop and implement disaster resilience building practice-based curricula helped to create co-ownership and buy-in on the topic and approach among community members and partner organizations; demonstrating the importance of informed and participatory community engagement throughout resilience building process.

Learning Areas:

Environmental health sciences
Other professions or practice related to public health
Planning of health education strategies, interventions, and programs
Program planning
Public health or related nursing
Public health or related research

Learning Objectives:
Discuss the importance of using CBPR/community engaged development processes when working with community disaster resilience building programs. Describe the four levers of community resilience as active operationalized building blocks to be used by communities in developing more resilience.

Keyword(s): Participatory Research, Disasters

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I serve as the Executive Director of the Loma Linda University School of Public Health Center for Community Resilience (CCR) where the focus on supporting the development of health, whole, resilient communities is achieved through targeted community engagement, research and initiatives in cross-cutting areas of public health. One of our focus areas is emergency public health and preparedness and CCR collaborates closely with the LLU Center for Public Health Preparedness in this research.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.