Online Program

334298
Applying the RE-AIM Framework to Evaluate Large-Scale Obesity Prevention Policy, Systems and Environmental Change Efforts in Los Angeles County


Sunday, November 1, 2015

Emily Caesar, MPH, MSW, Division of Chronic Disease and Injury Prevention, Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA
Katherine Rolfsmeyer, MPH, Nutrition and Physical Activity Program, Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA
Lisa Arangua, MPP, Chronic Disease and Injury Prevention, Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA
Tony Kuo, MD, MSHS, Department of Family Medicine and the David Geffen School Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
Brenda Robles, MPH, Division of Chronic Disease and Injury Prevention, Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA
Jack Thompson, MPH, Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, Nutrition and Activity Program, LOS ANGELES, CA
Introduction: In 2013, the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health (DPH) began delivering nutrition services through the Nutrition Education and Obesity Prevention (NEOP) program. As part of its scope, NEOP facilitates policy, systems and environmental (PSE) changes to support healthy nutrition and physical activity behaviors among Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program-eligible residents of Los Angeles County. The RE-AIM Framework was applied to evaluate 164 PSE interventions implemented by DPH and its funded partners. There is limited best-practice information available to guide application of RE-AIM in the context of large-scale, multi-partner efforts. This presentation describes DPH’s roadmap for using RE-AIM to evaluate PSE interventions. Preliminary results and lessons learned are discussed.  

Approach: DPH developed a RE-AIM evaluation protocol to gain buy-in from partners, provide training, ensure consistent data collection, and disseminate findings for the purpose of program planning, continuous improvement, and best practice development. 16 key-informant interviews were conducted with partners to solicit feedback on the PSE evaluation process.

Results: DPH and its 17 funded partners utilize RE-AIM to regularly monitor and evaluate PSE activities. County-level findings have been used to inform PSE implementation. Partners have reported that, while substantial technical assistance and time commitment was required initially, RE-AIM application increased internal capacity to monitor and evaluate programs. Partner feedback was leveraged to refine processes for PSE evaluation and provision of technical assistance.

Discussion: The RE-AIM application strategy employed represents a model of practice that program planners may adopt to support partner and grantee utilization of standardized evaluation methods.

Learning Areas:

Conduct evaluation related to programs, research, and other areas of practice
Program planning

Learning Objectives:
Discuss RE-AIM framework’s utility in monitoring and evaluation of PSE interventions. Describe methods for scaling the application of the RE-AIM framework as a program planning, monitoring, and evaluation tool across an array of PSE projects implemented by many funded partners. Identify lessons learned from applying RE-AIM framework to county-wide obesity prevention PSE projects.

Keyword(s): Obesity, Evaluation

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I lead PSE evaluation efforts for the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health Nutrition and Physical Activity Program. I am a Master of Public Health and of Social Work.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.