Annual Meeting Recordings are now available for purchase
314005
Connecting the dots through monitoring student achievement
Tuesday, November 18, 2014
: 10:30 AM - 10:50 AM
James VanDerslice, PhD
,
Division of Public Health, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
CEPH Accreditation Criterion 2.7 for Public Health Programs recognizes the importance of assessment by requiring “procedures for assessing and documenting the extent to which each student has demonstrated achievement of the competencies defined for his or her degree program and area of concentration.” However, assessment process can be more effective if they go beyond assuring that at the end of the program competencies are met. Incorporating the assessment process into the educational program as an ongoing activity not only helps to identify deficiencies earlier in the educational program, but helps to improve the students’ understanding of the meaning and importance of competencies is their professional development.
Learning Areas:
Public health or related organizational policy, standards, or other guidelines
Learning Objectives:
Describe how assessment fits into the educational process
Describe the attributes of an effective assessment system
List different types of on-going assessment strategies
Presenting author's disclosure statement:Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I have worked in graduate public health eduction for accredited public health programs for over 15 years.
Any relevant financial relationships? No
I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines,
and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed
in my presentation.